Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature

• Published in: EClinicalMedicine Vol. 48; p. 101454
• Main Authors: Cascini, Fidelia, Pantovic, Ana, Al-Ajlouni, Yazan A., Failla, Giovanna, Puleo, Valeria, Melnyk, Andriy, Lontano, Alberto, Ricciardi, Walter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: COVID-19 vaccines; Global health; Pandemics; Public health; Social behaviors; Social media; Systematic review; Vaccine hesitancy; Viral infections; COVID-19 vaccines; Global health; Pandemics; Vaccine hesitancy; Social media; Systematic review; Public health; Viral infections; Social behaviors
• ISSN: 2589-5370; 2589-5370
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101454

Vaccine hesitancy continues to limit global efforts in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging research demonstrates the role of social media in disseminating information and potentially influencing people's attitudes towards public health campaigns. This systematic review sought to synthesize the current evidence regarding the potential role of social media in shaping COVID-19 vaccination attitudes, and to explore its potential for shaping public health interventions to address the issue of vaccine hesitancy. We performed a systematic review of the studies published from inception to 13 of March2022 by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsychNET, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE. Studies that reported outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (attitudes, opinion, etc.) gathered from the social media platforms, and those analyzing the relationship between social media use and COVID-19 hesitancy/acceptance were included. Studies that reported no outcome of interest or analyzed data from sources other than social media (websites, newspapers, etc.) will be excluded. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of all cross-sectional studies included in this review. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021283219). Of the 2539 records identified, a total of 156 articles fully met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the cross-sectional studies was moderate – 2 studies received 10 stars, 5 studies received 9 stars, 9 studies were evaluated with 8, 12 studies with 7,16 studies with 6, 11 studies with 5, and 6 studies with 4 stars. The included studies were categorized into four categories. Cross-sectional studies reporting the association between reliance on social media and vaccine intentions mainly observed a negative relationship. Studies that performed thematic analyses of extracted social media data, mainly observed a domination of vaccine hesitant topics. Studies that explored the degree of polarization of specific social media contents related to COVID-19 vaccines observed a similar degree of content for both positive and negative tone posted on different social media platforms. Finally, studies that explored the fluctuations of vaccination attitudes/opinions gathered from social media identified specific events as significant cofactors that affect and shape vaccination intentions of individuals. This thorough examination of the various roles social media can play in disseminating information to the public, as well as how individuals behave on social media in the context of public health events, articulates the potential of social media as a platform of public health intervention to address vaccine hesitancy. None.