Development and validation of a mass spectrometry binding assay for mGlu5 receptor

Mass spectrometry (MS) binding assays are a label-free alternative to radioligand or fluorescence binding assays, so the readout is based on direct mass spectrometric detection of the test ligand. The study presented here describes the development and validation of a highly sensitive, rapid, and rob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry Vol. 412; no. 22; pp. 5525 - 5535
Main Authors Ricart-Ortega, Maria, Berizzi, Alice E., Catena, Juanlo, Malhaire, Fanny, Muñoz, Lourdes, Serra, Carmen, Lebon, Guillaume, Goudet, Cyril, Llebaria, Amadeu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2020
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mass spectrometry (MS) binding assays are a label-free alternative to radioligand or fluorescence binding assays, so the readout is based on direct mass spectrometric detection of the test ligand. The study presented here describes the development and validation of a highly sensitive, rapid, and robust MS binding assay for the quantification of the binding of the metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) negative allosteric modulator (NAM), MPEP (2-methyl-6-phenylethynylpyridine) at the mGlu5 allosteric binding site. The LC-ESI-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometric) analytical method was established and validated with a deuterated analogue of MPEP as an internal standard. The developed MS binding assay described here allowed for the determination of MS binding affinity estimates that were in agreement with affinity estimates obtained from a tritiated MPEP radioligand saturation binding assay, indicating the suitability of this methodology for determining affinity estimates for compounds that target mGlu5 allosteric binding sites. Graphical abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1618-2642
1618-2650
DOI:10.1007/s00216-020-02772-9