Identification of the Plant for Upright Stance in Humans: Multiple Movement Patterns From a Single Neural Strategy
1 Department of Kinesiology and 2 Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Submitted 23 September 2008; accepted in final form 25 September 2008 We determined properties of the plant during human upright stance using a closed-loop system identific...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 100; no. 6; pp. 3394 - 3406 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Am Phys Soc
01.12.2008
American Physiological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | 1 Department of Kinesiology and 2 Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Submitted 23 September 2008;
accepted in final form 25 September 2008
We determined properties of the plant during human upright stance using a closed-loop system identification method originally applied to human postural control by another group. To identify the plant, which was operationally defined as the mapping from muscle activation (rectified EMG signals) to body segment angles, we rotated the visual scene about the axis through the subject's ankles using a sum-of-sines stimulus signal. Because EMG signals from ankle muscles and from hip and lower trunk muscles showed similar responses to the visual perturbation across frequency, we combined EMG signals from all recorded muscles into a single plant input. Body kinematics were described by the trunk and leg angles in the sagittal plane. The phase responses of both angles to visual scene angle were similar at low frequencies and approached a difference of 150° at higher frequencies. Therefore we considered leg and trunk angles as separate plant outputs. We modeled the plant with a two-joint (ankle and hip) model of the body, a second-order low-pass filter from EMG activity to active joint torques, and intrinsic stiffness and damping at both joints. The results indicated that the in-phase (ankle) pattern was neurally generated, whereas the out-of-phase pattern was caused by plant dynamics. Thus a single neural strategy leads to multiple kinematic patterns. Moreover, estimated intrinsic stiffness in the model was insufficient to stabilize the plant.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Kiemel, Dept. of Kinesiology, College Park, MD 20742 (E-mail: kiemel{at}umd.edu ) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. |
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.01272.2007 |