Ki67 is a Graded Rather than a Binary Marker of Proliferation versus Quiescence

Ki67 staining is widely used as a proliferation indicator in the clinic, despite poor understanding of this protein’s function or dynamics. Here, we track Ki67 levels under endogenous control in single cells over time and find that Ki67 accumulation occurs only during S, G2, and M phases. Ki67 is de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCell reports (Cambridge) Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 1105 - 1112.e5
Main Authors Miller, Iain, Min, Mingwei, Yang, Chen, Tian, Chengzhe, Gookin, Sara, Carter, Dylan, Spencer, Sabrina L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 31.07.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ki67 staining is widely used as a proliferation indicator in the clinic, despite poor understanding of this protein’s function or dynamics. Here, we track Ki67 levels under endogenous control in single cells over time and find that Ki67 accumulation occurs only during S, G2, and M phases. Ki67 is degraded continuously in G1 and G0 phases, regardless of the cause of entry into G0/quiescence. Consequently, the level of Ki67 during G0 and G1 in individual cells is highly heterogeneous and depends on how long an individual cell has spent in G0. Thus, Ki67 is a graded rather than a binary marker both for cell-cycle progression and time since entry into quiescence. [Display omitted] •Ki67 levels are hard-wired into cell-cycle progression and cell-cycle exit•Ki67 is degraded continuously in G0 and G1 and accumulates from S to M phases•Ki67 levels in G0 and G1 indicate how long a cell has spent in G0/G1•This study enhances interpretation of this common clinical biomarker Ki67 is one of the most widely used markers of proliferation in oncology. Contrary to its canonical use as a binary marker of proliferation versus quiescence, Miller et al. find that Ki67 levels decay steadily in quiescent cells, which may enable more advanced clinical applications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
I.M. conducted experiments and analyses and interpreted the data; M.M. generated the mCitrine-Ki67 line, conducted experiments and analyses, and interpreted the data; C.Y. conducted all experiments on MCF7, OVCAR3, and A375 cells. C.T. built the models to estimate time since mitosis using the Ki67 level; S.G. performed thetime lapsefollowed by immunofluorescence experiment in MCF10A and analyzed the data; D.C. designed the mCitrine-Ki67 knockin strategy; S.L.S. conceived of the project, suggested the experiments, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript with I.M. and M.M.
ISSN:2211-1247
2211-1247
DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.110