Management strategies and outcomes in renal transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19: A retrospective, multicentre, cohort study

There is an enormous knowledge gap on management strategies, clinical outcomes, and follow-up after kidney transplantation (KT) in recipients that have recovered from coronavirus disease (COVID-19). We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis in 23 Indian transplant centres between June 26,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEClinicalMedicine Vol. 46; p. 101359
Main Authors Kute, Vivek B., Ray, Deepak S., Aziz, Feroz, Godara, Suraj M., Hegde, Umapati, KumarBT, Anil, Bhalla, Anil K., Yadav, Dinesh Kumar, Singh, Sarbpreet, Pathak, Vivek, Dalal, Sonal, Bahadur, Madan M., Anandh, Urmila, Abraham M, Abi, Siddini, Vishwanath, Das, Sushree Sashmita, Thukral, Sharmila, Krishnakumar, Arvind, Sharma, Ashish, Kher, Vijay, Bansal, Shyam B., Shingare, Ashay, Narayanan, Ranjit, Patel, Himanshu, Gulati, Sanjeev, Kakde, Shailesh, Bansal, Dinesh, Guleria, Sandeep, Khullar, Dinesh, Gumber, Manoj R., Varyani, Umesh, Guditi, Swarnalatha, Khetan, Prakash, Dave, Rutul, Mishra, Vineet V., Tullius, Stefan G., Chauhan, Sanshriti, Meshram, Hari Shankar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is an enormous knowledge gap on management strategies, clinical outcomes, and follow-up after kidney transplantation (KT) in recipients that have recovered from coronavirus disease (COVID-19). We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis in 23 Indian transplant centres between June 26, 2020 to December 1, 2021 on KT recipients who recovered after COVID-19 infections. We analyzed clinical and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR) incidence and used cox-proportional modeling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for predictors of AR. We also performed competing risk analysis. Additional outcome measures included graft loss, all-cause mortality, waiting time from a positive real-time polymerase test (RT-PCR) to KT, laboratory parameters, and quality of life in follow-up. Among 372 KT which included 38(10·21%) ABO-incompatible, 12(3·22%) sensitized, 64(17·20%) coexisting donors with COVID-19 history and 20 (5·37%) recipients with residual radiographic abnormalities, the incidence of AR was 34 (9·1%) with 1(0·26%) death censored graft loss, and 4(1·07%) all-cause mortality over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 241 (106–350) days. In our cox hazard proportional analysis, absence of oxygen requirement during COVID-19 compared to oxygen need [HR = 0·14(0·03–0·59); p-value = 0·0071], and use of thymoglobulin use compared to other induction strategies [HR = 0·17(0·03–0.95); p-value = 0·044] had a lower risk for AR. Degree of Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR mismatch had the highest risk of AR [HR = 10.2(1·74–65·83); p-value = 0·011]. With competing risk analysis, with death as a competing event, HLA DR mismatch, and oxygen requirement continued to be associated with AR. Age, gender, obesity, inflammatory markers, dialysis vintage, steroid use, sensitization and ABO-incompatibility have not been associated with a higher risk of AR. The median duration between COVID-19 real time polymerase test negativity to transplant was 88(40–145) days (overall), and ranged from 88(40–137), 65(42–120), 110(49–190), and 127(64–161) days in World Health Organization ordinal scale ≤ 3, 4, 5, and 6–7, respectively. There was no difference in quality of life, tacrolimus levels, blood counts, and mean serum creatinine assessed in patients with a past COVID-19 infection independent of severity. Our findings support that the outcomes of KT after COVID-19 recovery are excellent with absence of COVID-19 sequelae during follow-up. Additionally, there does not seem to be a need for changes in the induction/immunosuppression regimen based on the severity of COVID-19. Sanofi
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2589-5370
2589-5370
DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101359