Comparison of gradient- and spin-echo imaging: CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements by bolus tracking

The authors measured cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) in pigs by gadodiamide bolus injections and the bolus tracking technique. Two different pulse sequences were applied and compared: gradient‐echo (GE) and spin‐echo (SE) echoplanar imaging (EPI)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 411 - 416
Main Authors Simonsen, Claus Z., Østergaard, Leif, Smith, Donald F., Vestergaard-Poulsen, Peter, Gyldensted, Carsten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The authors measured cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) in pigs by gadodiamide bolus injections and the bolus tracking technique. Two different pulse sequences were applied and compared: gradient‐echo (GE) and spin‐echo (SE) echoplanar imaging (EPI). After normalization of CBF and CBV values to the area under the arterial input function (AIF), a linear relation between the two methods was found, suggesting that a previous normalization approach for determining absolute CBF by SE EPI may be extended to GE EPI measurements. The ratio between CBV values measured with GE and SE [CBV (GE)/CBV (SE)] was 2.96. Assuming that the GE acquisition reflects total CBV, our findings suggest that SE is sensitive to 34% (1/2.96) of the total vasculature. The corresponding ratio for CBF was 2.53. There was no significant difference in these two ratios, suggesting that MTT estimates derived from GE and SE EPI measurements are comparable. The findings suggest that SE and GE are equally useful in clinical measurements of functional parameters such as CBF, CBV, and MTT in the brain. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:411–416. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:Novo Nordisk Foundation
Institute of Experimental Clinical Research
Aarhus University Research Foundation
Ib Henriksen Foundation
ISMRM student stipend fund
istex:5522FAE132A30345E39B40802FCB802A1064D086
ark:/67375/WNG-CZZQZW4C-Z
Presented at the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Seventh Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, 1999.
Aarhus University
ArticleID:JMRI6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/1522-2586(200009)12:3<411::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO;2-5