Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sulfur

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State France and co‐rapporteur Member State Slovenia for the pesticide active substance sulfur and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEFSA journal Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. e07805 - n/a
Main Authors Alvarez, Fernando, Arena, Maria, Auteri, Domenica, Binaglia, Marco, Castoldi, Anna Federica, Chiusolo, Arianna, Colagiorgi, Angelo, Colas, Mathilde, Crivellente, Federica, De Lentdecker, Chloe, De Magistris, Isabella, Egsmose, Mark, Fait, Gabriella, Ferilli, Franco, Gouliarmou, Varvara, Nogareda, Laia Herrero, Ippolito, Alessio, Istace, Frederique, Jarrah, Samira, Kardassi, Dimitra, Kienzler, Aude, Lanzoni, Anna, Lava, Roberto, Leuschner, Renata, Linguadoca, Alberto, Lythgo, Christopher, Magrans, Oriol, Mangas, Iris, Miron, Ileana, Molnar, Tunde, Padovani, Laura, Panzarea, Martina, Parra Morte, Juan Manuel, Rizzuto, Simone, Serafimova, Rositsa, Sharp, Rachel, Szentes, Csaba, Szoradi, Andras, Terron, Andrea, Theobald, Anne, Tiramani, Manuela, Vianello, Giorgia, Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Acaricides
Cereals
Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
fungicide
Fungicides
MRL review
Peer review
pesticide
Pesticides
Reviews
Risk assessment
Sulfur
Task forces
Toxicology
Triticale
Working groups
Slovenia
France
Portugal
Europe
risk assessment
sulfur
MRL review
fungicide
peer review
pesticide
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State France and co‐rapporteur Member State Slovenia for the pesticide active substance sulfur and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of sulfur as a fungicide and acaricide on grapevine and cereals (wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Approved: 21 December 2022
Question number EFSA‐Q‐2017‐00275
Acknowledgements EFSA wishes to thank the rapporteur Member State France for the preparatory work on this scientific output.
Note/Update This scientific output, approved on 21 December 2022, supersedes the previous output published on 6 April 2009 (EFSA, 2009).
Requestor European Commission
EFSA may include images or other content for which it does not hold copyright. In such cases, EFSA indicates the copyright holder and users should seek permission to reproduce the content from the original source.
Declarations of interest If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.
ISSN:1831-4732
1831-4732
2314-9396
DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7805