COMPLEMENTARY FEEDING INDICATORS FOR CHILDREN AGED 6 TO 23 MONTHS ACCORDING TO BREASTFEEDING STATUS

To verify if there are differences among the complementary feeding indicators of children aged 6-23 months according to the breastfeeding status. A cross-sectional study was carried out with 1,355 children aged 6-23 months in 2012 to evaluate five indicators proposed by the World Health Organization...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista Paulista de Pediatria Vol. 39; p. e2019408
Main Authors Leonez, Daniella Garcia Vidal Rodrigues, Melhem, Angélica Rocha de Freitas, Vieira, Daniele Gonçalves, Mello, Débora Falleiros de, Saldan, Paula Chuproski
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 01.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To verify if there are differences among the complementary feeding indicators of children aged 6-23 months according to the breastfeeding status. A cross-sectional study was carried out with 1,355 children aged 6-23 months in 2012 to evaluate five indicators proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and modified in accordance with Brazilian's recommendations "Ten steps to a healthy feeding: a feeding guide for children under two years old". The indicators used were: I. Introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods; II. Minimum dietary diversity; III. Minimum meal frequency; IV. Minimum acceptable diet, and V. Consumption of iron-rich foods. To verify differences between the complementary feeding indicators according to breastfeeding status, the F-statistic was used, with p≤0.05 meaning significant. Indicators I, II, and V were similar among breastfed and non-breastfed children; however, indicators III and IV presented a higher proportion of adequacy for non-breastfed children, with 94.9% (CI95% 93.2-96.2) versus 40.3% (CI95% 33.2-47.9) for indicator III, and 57.3% (CI95% 53.2-61.2) versus 23.1% (CI95% 17.4-30.1) for indicator IV. Non-breastfed children have better complementary feeding status, but the indicator III takes into account non-breast milk as a meal for non-breastfed children, which increased the number of dairy meals and influenced indicator IV (calculated from indicators II and III).
Bibliography:The authors declare there is no conflict of interests.
ISSN:0103-0582
1984-0462
DOI:10.1590/1984-0462/2021/39/2019408