Comparative study of intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA and urokinase for patients with acute cerebral infarction

Objective Cerebral infarction has a poor prognosis and causes a serious burden on families and society. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase (UK) are commonly used thrombolytic agents in the clinic. However, direct and powerful clinical trial evidence to determine the thera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of international medical research Vol. 48; no. 5; p. 300060519895352
Main Authors Sun, Fan, Liu, Heng, Fu, Hui-xiao, Zhang, Shuo, Qian, Xu-dong, Li, Jia-jia, Zhu, Yun-bo, Zhang, Xiao-xuan, Zhang, Jian, Qiu, Hai-peng, Kang, Ling-ling, Hu, Ya-jun, Zhao, Liang, Mi, Yan-juan, Gao, Yan-jun, Dou, Zhi-jie, Ma, Zheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Cerebral infarction has a poor prognosis and causes a serious burden on families and society. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase (UK) are commonly used thrombolytic agents in the clinic. However, direct and powerful clinical trial evidence to determine the therapeutic effect of rt-PA and UK on intravenous thrombolysis is lacking. Methods In this study, 180 patients with acute cerebral infarction were treated with rt-PA or UK. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, Barthel index, bleeding complications, and biomarkers were evaluated. Results No significant differences in NIHSS or Barthel scores were found between the groups. However, UK increased the risk of intracranial haemorrhage compared with rt-PA. rt-PA had increased activity in reducing serum levels of MMP-9 than UK. Conclusion Intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA and UK in the time window of acute cerebral infarction can achieve similar therapeutic effects, but rt-PA can further reduce the risk of cerebral haemorrhage and is relatively safer than UK.
ISSN:0300-0605
1473-2300
DOI:10.1177/0300060519895352