Resistance Exercise Training as a Primary Countermeasure to Age-Related Chronic Disease

Age is a primary risk factor for a number of chronic diseases including mobility disability, cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and cancer. Most physical activity guidelines emphasize the performance of 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous or 75 min of vigorous aerobic exercise training...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 10; p. 645
Main Authors Mcleod, Jonathan C., Stokes, Tanner, Phillips, Stuart M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 06.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Age is a primary risk factor for a number of chronic diseases including mobility disability, cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and cancer. Most physical activity guidelines emphasize the performance of 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous or 75 min of vigorous aerobic exercise training (AET) weekly for reduction of chronic disease risk. Nonetheless, there is an emerging body of evidence showing that resistance exercise training (RET) appears to be as effective as AET in reducing risk of several chronic diseases. It may also be that RET is more effective than AET in some regards; the converse is likely also true. We posit that the perceived divergent exercise mode-dependent health benefits of AET and RET are likely small in most cases. In this short review, our aim is to examine evidence of associations between the performance of RET and chronic health disease risk (mobility disability, T2D, CVD, cancer). We also postulate on how RET may be influencing chronic disease risk and how it is a critical component for healthy aging. Accumulating evidence points to RET as a potent and robust preventive strategy against a number of chronic diseases traditionally associated with the performance of AET, but evidence favors RET as a potent countermeasure against declines in mobility. On the basis of this review we propose that the promotion of RET should assume a more prominent position in exercise guidelines particularly for older persons.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Martin Burtscher, University of Innsbruck, Austria
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Reviewed by: Massimo Negro, University of Pavia, Italy; Robert Csapo, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Austria
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00645