Determinants of the Use of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization after Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Physicians routinely make difficult decisions about which patients with acute myocardial infarction should undergo angiography, which to refer for revascularization, and which type of revascularization procedure to use. 1 Although clinical trials have evaluated the effect of different strategies on...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 335; no. 16; pp. 1198 - 1205 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston, MA
Massachusetts Medical Society
17.10.1996
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Physicians routinely make difficult decisions about which patients with acute myocardial infarction should undergo angiography, which to refer for revascularization, and which type of revascularization procedure to use.
1
Although clinical trials have evaluated the effect of different strategies on outcome, the behavior and practice of physicians have rarely been studied in large trials.
2-7
In most practice guidelines, clinical risk factors are used to identify candidates appropriate for certain treatments.
8-10
Whether in clinical practice these characteristics identify patients suitable for the treatments remains unknown. The first prospective Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries trial (GUSTO-1) . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199610173351606 |