5-Aminolevulinic Acid False-Positive Rates in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma: Do Pseudoprogression and Radionecrosis Play a Role? A Meta-Analysis

Several studies have confirmed the impact of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) on the extent of resection in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, there are controversies on the 5-ALA fluorescence status in recurrent GBM surgery, with specific reference to pseudoprogression or radionecrosis; ther...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 848036
Main Authors Ricciardi, Luca, Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio, Scerrati, Alba, Stifano, Vito, Somma, Teresa, Ius, Tamara, Trungu, Sokol, Acqui, Michele, Raco, Antonino, Miscusi, Massimo, Della Pepa, Giuseppe Maria
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several studies have confirmed the impact of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) on the extent of resection in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, there are controversies on the 5-ALA fluorescence status in recurrent GBM surgery, with specific reference to pseudoprogression or radionecrosis; therefore, the safety and accuracy of surgical planning in 5-ALA-assisted procedures in the recurrent context are still unclear. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the use of 5-ALA in newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM, consistently conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data on fluorescence status and correlation between fluorescence and histological findings were collected. We performed a meta-analysis of proportions to estimate the pooled rates of each outcome. Three online medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library) were screened, 448 articles were evaluated, and 3 papers were finally included for data analysis. Fluorescence rate was not different between newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM [p = 0.45; odds ratio (OR): 1.23; 95% CI: 0.72-2.09; I = 0%], while the rate of 5-ALA fluorescence-positive areas not associated with histological findings of GBM cells was higher in recurrent GBM (p = 0.04; OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06-0.91; I = 19%). Furthermore, there were no cases of radionecrosis in false-positive samples, while inflammation and signs of pseudoprogression were found in 81.4% of the cases. Therefore, a robust awareness of 5-ALA potentialities and pitfalls in recurrent GBM surgery should be considered for a cognizant surgical strategy. Further clinical trials could confirm the results of the present meta-analysis.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
Reviewed by: Stefano Maria Priola, Health Sciences North, Canada; Federico Giuseppe Legnani, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Italy
This article was submitted to Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Alfredo Conti, University of Bologna, Italy
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.848036