Contrast-Enhanced MRI Evaluation of Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and Hamstring ACL Autograft Healing in Humans: A Prospective Randomized Study

• Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Vol. 6; no. 10; p. 2325967118800298
• Main Authors: Covey, Dana Curtis, Sandoval, Korina Erin, Riffenburgh, Robert H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2018; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Knee; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Orthopedics; Sports medicine; autograft; revascularization; ACL graft healing; MRI
• ISSN: 2325-9671; 2325-9671
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967118800298

Background: Gadopentetate dimeglumine–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or gadolinium-enhanced MRI, was used to prospectively study the postoperative course of bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and combined semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) tendon autografts following arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in humans. Gadopentetate dimeglumine is a contrast agent that has been shown to enhance the signal of vascularized tissue when examined by MRI. Purpose: To prospectively determine and compare the pattern and timing of autograft revascularization following arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction by BPTB or STG autografts. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 73 patients (63 males, 10 females) with ACL tears who were scheduled to undergo reconstruction consented to participate in this study. The patients were randomized to receive arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the ACL employing either BPTB or STG autografts. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans were scheduled at 3-month intervals during the first postoperative year to assess the integrity, timing, and pattern of enhancement of the ACL graft. The temporal sequence and morphologic characteristics of imaged signals were compared for both types of ACL reconstructions. Results: Based on all knees with 1 exception, there were no statistically significant differences in gadopentetate dimeglumine–mediated graft enhancement grade observed between BPTB and STG autografts. Conclusion: The results suggest that autograft revascularization probably varies in intensity and location during the time course of graft healing. The interval signal changes observed 3 to 9 months, but especially 6 to 9 months, postoperatively are due to increased contrast uptake as a reflection of ongoing neovascularization during the process of ligamentization.