Marriage and Offending among a Cohort of Disadvantaged African Americans

Objectives: Drawing on Sampson and Laub’s age-graded theory of informal social control, this research tests the generalizability of the marriage effect on desistance from crime. Specifically, do urban African American men and women living in the United States benefit from marriage similarly to White...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of research in crime and delinquency Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 104 - 131
Main Authors Doherty, Elaine Eggleston, Ensminger, Margaret E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.02.2013
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Africa
African Americans
Arrest
Arrests
Black White Differences
Chicago, Illinois
Crime
Crime Prevention
Criminology
Females
Grade 1
Hierarchical Linear Modeling
Males
Marriage
Offenders
Regression analysis
Social control
U.S.A
United States > US
criminological theory
developmental theories
desistance from crime
race/ethnicity
life-course theory
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives: Drawing on Sampson and Laub’s age-graded theory of informal social control, this research tests the generalizability of the marriage effect on desistance from crime. Specifically, do urban African American men and women living in the United States benefit from marriage similarly to Whites? Methods: The authors use hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to analyze the relationship between marriage and official arrest counts among African American male and female first graders from Woodlawn, an inner-city community in Chicago, first assessed in 1966 and followed up at three time points (ages 16, 32, and 42). Results: The authors find strong evidence of a marriage effect for the males across crime type, with a reduction in offending between 21 percent and 36 percent when in a state of marriage. The findings for females were less consistent across crime type, a 10 percent reduction in the odds of a property arrest and a 9 percent increase in the odds of a drug arrest when in a state of marriage. Conclusions: Their findings provide evidence in favor of the generality of Sampson and Laub’s theory, at least for males. However, the authors were not able to evaluate the mechanisms of desistance and identify this as an area of future research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-4278
1552-731X
DOI:10.1177/0022427811423106