The Second Life of Institutions: Social Poetics in a Digital State
In the bureaucratic moments that Michael Herzfeld describes, functionaries of the nation-state deny the contingent points of possible connection with their hapless subjects yet draw on a common symbolic language to do so—thus is the institution reproduced. Such ethnographic moments implicitly rely o...
Saved in:
Published in | Anthropological quarterly Vol. 83; no. 2; pp. 355 - 371 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
George Washington University Institute for Ethnographic Research
01.04.2010
Institute for Ethnographic Research |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-5491 1534-1518 1534-1518 |
DOI | 10.1353/anq.0.0119 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In the bureaucratic moments that Michael Herzfeld describes, functionaries of the nation-state deny the contingent points of possible connection with their hapless subjects yet draw on a common symbolic language to do so—thus is the institution reproduced. Such ethnographic moments implicitly rely on other moments, those informed by their expressed lack of total order: illicit activities, games, and competitive verbal performance; cultural intimacy is generated in such occasions of private fallibility. This article explores what happens when a different kind of institution, a virtual world maker, attempts to colonize such disorder to govern legitimately. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0003-5491 1534-1518 1534-1518 |
DOI: | 10.1353/anq.0.0119 |