The Second Life of Institutions: Social Poetics in a Digital State

In the bureaucratic moments that Michael Herzfeld describes, functionaries of the nation-state deny the contingent points of possible connection with their hapless subjects yet draw on a common symbolic language to do so—thus is the institution reproduced. Such ethnographic moments implicitly rely o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnthropological quarterly Vol. 83; no. 2; pp. 355 - 371
Main Author Malaby, Thomas M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington George Washington University Institute for Ethnographic Research 01.04.2010
Institute for Ethnographic Research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-5491
1534-1518
1534-1518
DOI10.1353/anq.0.0119

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the bureaucratic moments that Michael Herzfeld describes, functionaries of the nation-state deny the contingent points of possible connection with their hapless subjects yet draw on a common symbolic language to do so—thus is the institution reproduced. Such ethnographic moments implicitly rely on other moments, those informed by their expressed lack of total order: illicit activities, games, and competitive verbal performance; cultural intimacy is generated in such occasions of private fallibility. This article explores what happens when a different kind of institution, a virtual world maker, attempts to colonize such disorder to govern legitimately.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0003-5491
1534-1518
1534-1518
DOI:10.1353/anq.0.0119