Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria

Binary logistic regression is one of the most frequently applied statistical approaches for developing clinical prediction models. Developers of such models often rely on an Events Per Variable criterion (EPV), notably EPV ≥10, to determine the minimal sample size required and the maximum number of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistical methods in medical research Vol. 28; no. 8; pp. 2455 - 2474
Main Authors van Smeden, Maarten, Moons, Karel GM, de Groot, Joris AH, Collins, Gary S, Altman, Douglas G, Eijkemans, Marinus JC, Reitsma, Johannes B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.08.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Binary logistic regression is one of the most frequently applied statistical approaches for developing clinical prediction models. Developers of such models often rely on an Events Per Variable criterion (EPV), notably EPV ≥10, to determine the minimal sample size required and the maximum number of candidate predictors that can be examined. We present an extensive simulation study in which we studied the influence of EPV, events fraction, number of candidate predictors, the correlations and distributions of candidate predictor variables, area under the ROC curve, and predictor effects on out-of-sample predictive performance of prediction models. The out-of-sample performance (calibration, discrimination and probability prediction error) of developed prediction models was studied before and after regression shrinkage and variable selection. The results indicate that EPV does not have a strong relation with metrics of predictive performance, and is not an appropriate criterion for (binary) prediction model development studies. We show that out-of-sample predictive performance can better be approximated by considering the number of predictors, the total sample size and the events fraction. We propose that the development of new sample size criteria for prediction models should be based on these three parameters, and provide suggestions for improving sample size determination.
ISSN:0962-2802
1477-0334
DOI:10.1177/0962280218784726