Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy-Specific Knowledge
Policy facts are among the most relevant forms of knowledge in a democracy. Although the mass media seem like an obvious source of policy-specific information, past research in this area has been plagued by design and methodological problems that have hindered causal inferences. Moreover, few studie...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of political science Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 73 - 89 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.01.2009
Blackwell Publishing Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Policy facts are among the most relevant forms of knowledge in a democracy. Although the mass media seem like an obvious source of policy-specific information, past research in this area has been plagued by design and methodological problems that have hindered causal inferences. Moreover, few studies include measures of media content, preventing researchers from being able to say what it is about media coverage that influences learning. We advance the literature by employing a simple but underutilized approach for estimating the causal effects of news coverage. Drawing upon a unique collection of cross-sectional survey data, we make within-survey/within-subjects comparisons under conditions of high and low media coverage. We show how the volume, breadth, and prominence of news media coverage increase policy-specific knowledge above and beyond common demographic factors. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:1361C37A9BE4C0E8413A7812AE888B7A9206E6B1 ark:/67375/WNG-WD3CPN8B-W ArticleID:AJPS358 We thank the following people for helpful comments and assistance: Larry Bartels, John Benson, Robert Blendon, Toby Bolson, Barry Burden, Maria Geraci, Gary King, Jim Kuklinski, Jeff Mondak, and Will Moore. We also thank the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and participants in the Scholars in Health Policy Research Program seminars. Data for this study come from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research at the University of Connecticut. This project is also supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SES‐0818583). SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0092-5853 1540-5907 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00358.x |