The Cellular, Developmental and Population-Genetic Determinants of Mutation-Rate Evolution

Although the matter has been subject to considerable theoretical study, there are numerous open questions regarding the mechanisms driving the mutation rate in various phylogenetic lineages. Most notably, empirical evidence indicates that mutation rates are elevated in multicellular species relative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenetics (Austin) Vol. 180; no. 2; pp. 933 - 943
Main Author Lynch, Michael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Genetics Soc America 01.10.2008
Genetics Society of America
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although the matter has been subject to considerable theoretical study, there are numerous open questions regarding the mechanisms driving the mutation rate in various phylogenetic lineages. Most notably, empirical evidence indicates that mutation rates are elevated in multicellular species relative to unicellular eukaryotes and prokaryotes, even on a per-cell division basis, despite the need for the avoidance of somatic damage and the accumulation of germline mutations. Here it is suggested that multicellularity discourages selection against weak mutator alleles for reasons associated with both the cellular and the population-genetic environments, thereby magnifying the vulnerability to somatic mutations (cancer) and increasing the risk of extinction from the accumulation of germline mutations. Moreover, contrary to common belief, a cost of fidelity need not be invoked to explain the lower bound to observed mutation rates, which instead may simply be set by the inability of selection to advance very weakly advantageous antimutator alleles in finite populations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Author e-mail: milynch@indiana.edu
Communicating editor: J. A. Birchler
ISSN:0016-6731
1943-2631
1943-2631
DOI:10.1534/genetics.108.090456