Comparison of fatty acid analysis methods for assessing biorefinery applicability of wastewater cultivated microalgae

In this study, we compared the performances of four different gas chromatography (GC) based microalgal fatty acid analysis methods that are typically applied to biorefinery research using wastewater-adapted microalgae. Compared with the HP-5-type non-polar column, WAX-type polar columns exhibited ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTalanta (Oxford) Vol. 97; pp. 103 - 110
Main Authors Woo, Sung-Geun, Yoo, Keunje, Lee, Juyoun, Bang, Sara, Lee, Myungjin, On, Kwangchul, Park, Joonhong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.08.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study, we compared the performances of four different gas chromatography (GC) based microalgal fatty acid analysis methods that are typically applied to biorefinery research using wastewater-adapted microalgae. Compared with the HP-5-type non-polar column, WAX-type polar columns exhibited excellent abilities to quantitatively separate C16-C18 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) from selected wastewater-adapted microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris, Ankistrodesmus gracilis and Scenedesmus quadricauda) isolates. GC-mass spectroscopy (MS) using the WAX-type polar column provided the strongest detection sensitivity among the tested methods by lowest detection limit, and GC-flame ionized detector (FID) with the same polar column exhibited nearly consistent results to GC-MS analysis. Our statistical comparison of microalgal fatty acid composition profiles generated using various GC methods, microalgal resources and culture media (wastewater, BG11 and nitrogen limitation) suggested that an appropriate GC method and algal resource choice are more important than the optimization of culture conditions to evaluate the applicability of microalgal biorefinery using wastewater resources. ► We added more explanations regarding the lack-of-fit tests and F-ratio. ► We added discussion about the differences of FA profiles among 3 microalgae. ► We corrected additional errors in terms, units or English usage as suggested.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0039-9140
1873-3573
DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.04.002