Lab-scale study on the application of In-Adit-Sulfate-Reducing System for AMD control

• Published in: Journal of hazardous materials Vol. 160; no. 2; pp. 441 - 447
• Main Authors: Ji, S.W., Kim, S.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier B.V 30.12.2008; Elsevier
• Subjects: Acid mine drainage (AMD); Acids; Anaerobiosis; Applied sciences; Electric Conductivity; Exact sciences and technology; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; In-Adit-Sulfate-Reducing System (IASRS); Industrial Waste - analysis; Metals - analysis; Metals - isolation & purification; Mining; Oxygen - chemistry; Pollution; SAPS; Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission; Sulfates - analysis; Sulfates - isolation & purification; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; In-Adit-Sulfate-Reducing System (IASRS); SAPS; Acid mine drainage (AMD); Sulfate-reducing bacteria; pH control; Sulfates; Modeling; Overflow; Design; Chemical oxygen demand; Water quality; pH; Acid mine drainage
• ISSN: 0304-3894; 1873-3336
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.059

In a study of the 29 operating passive systems for acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment, 19 systems showed various performance problems. Some systems showed very low efficiency even without visible leakage or overflow. Though systems show fairly good efficiency in metal removal (mainly iron) and pH control, sulfate removal rates were very low which indicates the possibility of very poor sulfate reductions by Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB). As an alternative method, In-Adit-Sulfate-Reducing System (IASRS), the method of placing the SAPS inside the adit, to have temperature constant at about 15 °C, was suggested. Lab-scale model experiments of IASRS were carried out. The models 1 and 2 were run at 15 °C and 25 °C, respectively. The model 1 contained about a half of COD in the beginning of the operation than that of model 2. Metal removal ratios were higher than 90% in both systems. Both systems showed the sulfate removal ratios of 23% and 27%, respectively, which were still considerably low, even though higher than those of presently operating systems. However, since the synthetic AMD used was very low in pH (2.8) and very high in sulfate concentration, if some suggested modifications were applied to the standard design, it is presumed that the sulfate removal ratio would have increased.