Occurrence of antibiotics in hospital, residential, and dairy effluent, municipal wastewater, and the Rio Grande in New Mexico

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 366; no. 2; pp. 772 - 783
• Main Authors: Brown, Kathryn D., Kulis, Jerzy, Thomson, Bruce, Chapman, Timothy H., Mawhinney, Douglas B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Shannon Elsevier B.V 01.08.2006; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Applied sciences; CAFO; Continental surface waters; Dairying; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Effluent; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics; Environmental Monitoring; Exact sciences and technology; Hospitals; Industrial Waste; Medical Waste; Natural water pollution; New Mexico; Pharmaceuticals; Pollution; Pollution, environment geology; Rivers - chemistry; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Wastewaters; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; Water treatment and pollution; United States; New Mexico; North America; America; USA, New Mexico; CAFO; Hospitals; Antibiotics; Wastewater; Effluent; Pharmaceuticals; Drug; Pollutant behavior; Stream discharge; Concentration measurement; Persistence; Domestic waste water; Antibiotic; Industrial waste water; Surface water; Dairy industry; Hospital; Waste water purification; Waste water discharge; Organic compounds; Concentration distribution
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.10.007

This study had three objectives: 1) determine occurrence of antibiotics in effluent from hospitals, residential facilities, and dairies, and in municipal wastewater 2) determine antibiotic removal at a large wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Albuquerque, NM, and 3) determine concentrations of antibiotics in the Rio Grande, which receives wastewater from the Albuquerque WWTP. Twenty-three samples of wastewater and 3 samples of Rio Grande water were analyzed for the presence of 11 antibiotics. Fifty-eight percent of samples had at least one antibiotic present while 25% had three or more. Hospital effluent had detections of sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, lincomycin, and penicillin G, with 4 of 5 hospital samples having at least one antibiotic detected and 3 having four or more. At the residential sampling sites, ofloxacin was found in effluent from assisted living and retirement facilities, while the student dormitory had no detects. Only lincomycin was detected in dairy effluent (in 2 of 8 samples, at 700 and 6600 ng/L). Municipal wastewater had detections of sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin, with 4 of 6 samples having at least one antibiotic present and 3 having 3 or more. The relatively high concentrations (up to 35,500 ng/L) of ofloxacin found in hospital and residential effluent may be of concern due to potential genotoxic effects and development of antibiotic resistance. At the Albuquerque WWTP, both raw wastewater and treated effluent had detections of sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and ofloxacin, at concentrations ranging from 110 to 470 ng/L. However, concentrations in treated effluent were reduced by 20% to 77%. No antibiotics were detected in the Rio Grande upstream of the Albuquerque WWTP discharge, and only one antibiotic, sulfamethoxazole, was detected in the Rio Grande (300 ng/L) below the WWTP.