Extended Reality "X-Reality" for Prosthesis Training of Upper-Limb Amputees: A Review on Current and Future Clinical Potential

The rejection rates of upper-limb prosthetic devices in adults are high, currently averaging 26% and 23% for body-powered and electric devices, respectively. While many factors influence acceptance, prosthesis training methods relying on novel virtual reality systems have been cited as a critical fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering Vol. 30; pp. 1652 - 1663
Main Authors Gaballa, Aya, Cavalcante, Reidner Santos, Lamounier, Edgard, Soares, Alcimar, Cabibihan, John-John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.01.2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The rejection rates of upper-limb prosthetic devices in adults are high, currently averaging 26% and 23% for body-powered and electric devices, respectively. While many factors influence acceptance, prosthesis training methods relying on novel virtual reality systems have been cited as a critical factor capable of increasing the likelihood of long-term, full-time use. Despite that, these implementations have not yet garnered widespread traction in the clinical setting, and their use remains immaterial. This review aims to explore the reasons behind this situation by identifying trends in existing research that seek to advance Extended Reality "X-Reality" systems for the sake of upper-limb prosthesis rehabilitation and, secondly, analyzing barriers and presenting potential pathways to deployment for successful adoption in the future. The search yielded 42 research papers that were divided into two categories. The first category included articles that focused on the technical aspect of virtual prosthesis training. Articles in the second category utilize user evaluation procedures to ensure applicability in a clinical environment. The review showed that 75% of articles that conducted whole system testing experimented with non-immersive virtual systems. Furthermore, there is a shortage of experiments performed with amputee subjects. From the large-scale studies analyzed, 71% of those recruited solely non-disabled participants. This paper shows that X-Reality technologies for prosthesis rehabilitation of upper-limb amputees carry significant benefits. Nevertheless, much still must be done so that the technology reaches widespread clinical use.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1534-4320
1558-0210
1558-0210
DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3179327