Caregivers provide more labeling responses to infants' pointing than to infants' object-directed vocalizations

Existing studies have observed a robust relationship between infants' pointing gestures and language outcomes. By contrast, infants' overall vocal production is not related to language outcomes. One possible explanation for the association between pointing and language is that pointing ges...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of child language Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 538 - 561
Main Authors WU, ZHEN, GROS-LOUIS, JULIE
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.05.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Existing studies have observed a robust relationship between infants' pointing gestures and language outcomes. By contrast, infants' overall vocal production is not related to language outcomes. One possible explanation for the association between pointing and language is that pointing gestures, as compared to vocalizations, may elicit more verbal responses from social partners that are facilitative for language learning. To test this, we observed forty-seven infants aged 1;0 during free play with their mothers and fathers separately to compare parents' verbal responses to infants' pointing gestures and object-directed vocalizations. Results showed that, compared to object-directed vocalizations, infants' pointing elicited more verbal responses from parents, particularly object labels. Moreover, mothers were more likely than fathers to provide labels. These results may help explain why pointing is associated with indices of language acquisition, but the production of vocalizations is not.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-0009
1469-7602
DOI:10.1017/S0305000914000221