Inter-subject variability of muscle synergies during bench press in power lifters and untrained individuals

The purpose of the study was to elucidate the role of expertise on muscle synergies involved in bench press. Ten expert power lifters (EXP) and nine untrained participants (UNT) completed three sets of eight repetitions at 60% of three repetition maximum in bench press. Muscle synergies were extract...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 89 - 97
Main Authors Kristiansen, M., Madeleine, P., Hansen, E. A., Samani, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of the study was to elucidate the role of expertise on muscle synergies involved in bench press. Ten expert power lifters (EXP) and nine untrained participants (UNT) completed three sets of eight repetitions at 60% of three repetition maximum in bench press. Muscle synergies were extracted from surface electromyography data of 21 bench press cycles using non‐negative matrix factorization algorithm. The synergy activation coefficient represents the relative contribution of the muscle synergy to the overall muscle activity pattern, while the muscle synergy vector represents the relative weighting of each muscle within each synergy. Describing more than 90% of the variability, two muscle synergies reflected the eccentric and concentric phase. The cross‐correlations (ρmax) for synergy activation coefficient 2 (concentric phase) were 0.83 [0.71;0.88] and 0.59 [0.49;0.77] [Median ρmax (25th;75th percentile)] (P = 0.001) in UNT and EXP, respectively. Median correlation coefficient (ρ) for muscle synergy vector 2 was 0.15 [−0.08;0.46] and 0.48 [0.02;0.70] (P = 0.03) in UNT and EXP, respectively. Thus, EXP showed larger inter‐subject variability than UNT in the synergy activation coefficient during the concentric phase, while the muscle synergy vectors were less variable in EXP. This points at the importance of a specialized neural strategy in elite bench press performance.
Bibliography:ArticleID:SMS12167
istex:585DF3CB9F90E379DA465258DE62BD67033E03F6
Ministry of Culture Committee on Sports Research in Denmark
Danish Council for Independent Research | Technology and Production Sciences - No. 10092821
Table S1. Cross-correlations of synergy activation coefficients (ρmax) and coefficients of correlation (ρ) of muscle synergy vectors for EXP and UNT. EXP, expert power lifters (n = 10); UNT, untrained subjects (n = 9).Table S2. Lag times (tmax) of synergy activation coefficients for EXP and UNT. EXP: expert power lifters (n = 10), UNT: untrained subjects (n = 9).
ark:/67375/WNG-XFVQLD38-R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0905-7188
1600-0838
1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/sms.12167