Effects of host shading on consumption and growth of the geometrid Epirrita autumnata: interactive roles of water, primary and secondary compounds

Shading is assumed to reduce allocation to plant phenolics and to defense in general. We here report the results of experimental shading of individual branches or whole canopies in mountain birch on foliar chemistry and on the growth and consumption of a geometrid, Epirrita autumnata. Branch-wide sh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOikos Vol. 103; no. 1; pp. 3 - 16
Main Authors Henriksson, J., Haukioja, E., Ossipov, V., Ossipova, S., Sillanpää, S., Kapari, L., Pihlaja, K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Copenhagen Munksgaard International Publishers 01.10.2003
Blackwell Publishers
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Shading is assumed to reduce allocation to plant phenolics and to defense in general. We here report the results of experimental shading of individual branches or whole canopies in mountain birch on foliar chemistry and on the growth and consumption of a geometrid, Epirrita autumnata. Branch-wide shading tended to have at least as strong effects on both leaf chemistry and herbivore performance as canopy-wide shading, indicating local responses of the host to shading. Responses to shading varied among the key leaf traits. Leaf water content was higher and toughness lower in shaded than in non-shaded leaves. Leaf sugars were lower and protein-bound and free amino acids higher in shaded than in control leaves. Sucrose and galactose were at high levels in unshaded branches adjacent to shaded ones, suggesting that partial shading enhanced translocation of sugars within canopies. Total phenolics and soluble proanthocyanidins were low in both shading treatments. Of the other phenolic groups, concentrations of gallotannins and cell-wall-bound proanthocyanidins did not differ between shaded and non-shaded leaves. Epirrita larvae grew better in both types of shading treatments compared to either unshaded control trees or to unshaded branches in the branch-shading trees. By far the most important correlate of larval growth was the amount of water consumed with leaf mass (r = 0.94). When variance in water intake was standardized (also largely eliminating parallel variation in proteins), fructose and glucose still had significant positive correlations and proanthocyanidins negative with larval growth on control but not on shade leaves. Concentrations of several phenolic compounds correlated negatively with intake of dry matter and especially water, and different phenolics were important in shaded (gallotannins) and in control (flavonoids) leaves. Our findings strongly suggest that the effects of putatively defensive leaf traits on insect consumption and growth interact with nutritive leaf traits, particularly with water.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-KSBB6WF4-4
ArticleID:OIK12306
istex:1A6E836DE0CD1E94F8FD078752A9A85036663B68
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0030-1299
1600-0706
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12306.x