Characterizing new users of NSAIDs before and after rofecoxib withdrawal

What is already known about this subject • Public concern regarding the cardiovascular safety of the COX‐2 inhibitors began with the withdrawal of rofecoxib from the market in September 2004. • Since then, a myriad of evidence has pointed towards an adverse cardiovascular effect of other COX‐2 inhib...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 63; no. 4; pp. 494 - 497
Main Authors Usher, Cara, Bennett, Kathleen, Teeling, Mary, Feely, John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2007
Blackwell Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:What is already known about this subject • Public concern regarding the cardiovascular safety of the COX‐2 inhibitors began with the withdrawal of rofecoxib from the market in September 2004. • Since then, a myriad of evidence has pointed towards an adverse cardiovascular effect of other COX‐2 inhibitors in persons with cardiovascular risk. • This study examines the impact of the clinical trial publicity and drug regulatory advice on nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing in patients in general practice with known cardiovascular risk both before and after the rofecoxib withdrawal. What this study adds • Results from this study indicate that the profile of new users of NSAIDs and COX‐2 inhibitors did not change despite new information becoming available. • This may highlight the uncertainty experienced by prescribers of treatment alternatives available and the lack of unbiased information at this time for at‐risk groups. Aims To characterize patients initiated on nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pre and postrofecoxib withdrawal, by age, gender and concomitant cardiovascular (CV) therapy. Methods A national primary care prescription database was used to identify patients who initiated NSAID therapy pre and postrofecoxib withdrawal. Patients receiving CV therapy were identified in the same periods also. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Results Female patients [OR = 1.15 (1.11, 1.19)], those over 65 years [OR = 2.76 (2.65, 2.86)] and those at CV risk [OR = 1.72 (1.67, 1.79)] were more likely to start on celecoxib (over a nonselective NSAID) than male patients, those under 65 years and those not at CV risk. Similar results were found for rofecoxib and nimesulide. Postwithdrawal analysis showed results comparable to the prewithdrawal period. Conclusion The results highlight a possible uncertainty experienced by prescribers of treatment alternatives available and a lack of unbiased information at this time for at‐risk groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02784.x