Comparing Various Short-Form Geriatric Depression Scales Leads to the GDS-5/15

Purpose: To compare three published short GDS scales and to identify a valid and reliable short‐form alternative to the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale. Design: Comparative validation study via retrospective chart review of 816 acute care patients in an 830‐bed academic medical center in the USA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nursing scholarship Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 133 - 137
Main Authors Weeks, Sandra Kenney, McGann, Paul E., Michaels, Teresa King, Penninx, Brenda W.J.H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Inc 01.01.2003
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: To compare three published short GDS scales and to identify a valid and reliable short‐form alternative to the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale. Design: Comparative validation study via retrospective chart review of 816 acute care patients in an 830‐bed academic medical center in the USA in 2001. Methods: Data of the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale, the Mini‐Mental State Examination, and demographic data were extracted from medical records after patient discharge. Three scales: the D'Ath GDS‐4, van Marwijk GDS‐4, and Hoyl GDS‐5, were compared to the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale. Results: The Hoyl 5‐item version showed the highest sensitivity (97.9%). Concern for GDS‐5 false positives when compared to the 15‐item GDS (specificity 72.7%) led to re‐ordering the 15 GDS items into a new two‐tiered instrument, the GDS‐5/15. In this study of 816 older adult inpatients, 60% were screened as “not depressed” using the first 5 items on the GDS‐5/15, leaving 40% for continued screening and completion of all 15 GDS items. Conclusions: A shorter screening tool might encourage more providers to add depression screening to routine health care visits. The GDS‐5/15 is an alternative screening tool.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JNU133
ark:/67375/WNG-51CFZF6V-3
istex:4BC51A38E95220B2B5009310A3AAAD34F0342631
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1527-6546
1547-5069
DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00133.x