The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health

NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 8; p. e106221
Main Authors Bedimo, Roger J., Drechsler, Henning, Jain, Mamta, Cutrell, James, Zhang, Song, Li, Xilong, Farukhi, Irfan, Castanon, Rosinda, Tebas, Pablo, Maalouf, Naim M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 29.08.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r). Virologic efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at baseline and week 48, and bone turnover markers (BTM) assessed at weeks 0, 16 and 48. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 62.5% of RAL subjects and 83.7% of TDF/FTC subjects were responders (VL<48 copies/mL) at week 48 (p = 0.045; chi-square test). The proportions of patients achieving VL<200 copies/mL were similar: 72.5% and 86.0% (p = 0.175). Premature treatment discontinuation was the main cause for failure. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Changes from baseline in RAL vs. TDF/FTC for CD4+ (+199 vs. +216 cells/µL, p = 0.63), total cholesterol/HDL (-0.25 vs. -0.71 mg/dL (p = 0.270), and eGFR (-4.4 vs. -7.9 ml/min, p = 0.44) were comparable between groups. Changes in subtotal BMD to week 48 were: +9.2 with RAL vs. -7 g/cm2 with TDF/FTC (p = 0.002). Mean CTX changes were +0.04 vs. +0.24 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and mean P1NP changes were +3.59 vs. +30.09 ng/mL (p = 0.023). BTM changes at week 16 predicted change in BMD by week 48 (R = -0.394, p = 0.003 for CTX; and R = -0.477, p<0.001 for P1NP). The NRTI-sparing regimen RAL+DRV/r did not achieve similar week 48 virologic efficacy compared with TDF/FTC+DRV/r, but was better with regard to markers of bone health. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00677300.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Competing Interests: Roger Bedimo has received research grants from Merck & Co, Janssen Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb. He’s also on ad-hoc scientific advisory boards for Janssen Therapeutics, ViiV Health Care, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Pablo Tebas is consultant for Merck & Co. and Gilead, speaker for Janssen Therapeutics and is on the adjudication committee for GSK. This specific study was funded by grants from Merck & Co, and Janssen Therapeutics to the VA North Texas Health Care System for Roger Bedimo. Raltegravir is a drug produced by Merck & Co. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.
Conceived and designed the experiments: RB. Performed the experiments: RB HD MJ JC RC IF NM. Analyzed the data: RB HD JC SZ XL NM PT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RB HD IF NM. Wrote the paper: RB HD PT NM JC.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0106221