How Does the Extraction of Local and Global Auditory Regularities Vary with Context?

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 9; no. 9; p. e107227
• Main Authors: Marti, Sébastien, Thibault, Louis, Dehaene, Stanislas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 08.09.2014; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Acoustics; Adult; Attention - physiology; Auditory Perception - physiology; Auditory stimuli; Biology and Life Sciences; Brain; Consciousness; Female; Humans; Male; Medical imaging; Memory; Photic Stimulation; Regularity; Sensory integration; Sound; Violations; Visual stimuli; Visual tasks; Young Adult; France
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107227

How does the human brain extract regularities from its environment? There is evidence that short range or 'local' regularities (within seconds) are automatically detected by the brain while long range or 'global' regularities (over tens of seconds or more) require conscious awareness. In the present experiment, we asked whether participants' attention was needed to acquire such auditory regularities, to detect their violation or both. We designed a paradigm in which participants listened to predictable sounds. Subjects could be distracted by a visual task at two moments: when they were first exposed to a regularity or when they detected violations of this regularity. MEG recordings revealed that early brain responses (100-130 ms) to violations of short range regularities were unaffected by visual distraction and driven essentially by local transitional probabilities. Based on global workspace theory and prior results, we expected that visual distraction would eliminate the long range global effect, but unexpectedly, we found the contrary, i.e. late brain responses (300-600 ms) to violations of long range regularities on audio-visual trials but not on auditory only trials. Further analyses showed that, in fact, visual distraction was incomplete and that auditory and visual stimuli interfered in both directions. Our results show that conscious, attentive subjects can learn the long range dependencies present in auditory stimuli even while performing a visual task on synchronous visual stimuli. Furthermore, they acquire a complex regularity and end up making different predictions for the very same stimulus depending on the context (i.e. absence or presence of visual stimuli). These results suggest that while short-range regularity detection is driven by local transitional probabilities between stimuli, the human brain detects and stores long-range regularities in a highly flexible, context dependent manner.