Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices

Voters prefer leaders with lower-pitched voices because they are perceived as stronger, having greater physical prowess, more competent, and having greater integrity. An alternative hypothesis that has yet to be tested is that lower-pitched voices are perceived as older and thus wiser and more exper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 10; no. 8; p. e0133779
Main Authors Klofstad, Casey A, Anderson, Rindy C, Nowicki, Stephen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 07.08.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Voters prefer leaders with lower-pitched voices because they are perceived as stronger, having greater physical prowess, more competent, and having greater integrity. An alternative hypothesis that has yet to be tested is that lower-pitched voices are perceived as older and thus wiser and more experienced. Here the relationships between candidate voice pitch, candidate age, and electoral success are examined with two experiments. Study 1 tests whether voters discriminate on candidate age. The results show that male and female candidates in their 40s and 50s, the time in the lifecycle when voice pitch is at its lowest, are preferred over candidates in their 30s, 60s, and 70s. Study 2 shows that the preference for leaders with lower-pitched voices correlates with the perception that speakers with lower voices are stronger, more competent, and older, but the influence of perception of age on vote choice is the weakest of the three.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: CAK RCA SN. Performed the experiments: CAK. Analyzed the data: CAK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CAK RCA SN. Wrote the paper: CAK RCA SN.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133779