The costs of scaling up HIV prevention for high risk groups: lessons learned from the Avahan Programme in India

The study objective is to measure, analyse costs of scaling up HIV prevention for high-risk groups in India, in order to assist the design of future HIV prevention programmes in South Asia and beyond. Prospective costing study. This study is one of the most comprehensive studies of the costs of HIV...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 9; p. e106582
Main Authors Chandrashekar, Sudhashree, Guinness, Lorna, Pickles, Michael, Shetty, Govindraj Y, Alary, Michel, Vickerman, Peter, Vassall, Anna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 09.09.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The study objective is to measure, analyse costs of scaling up HIV prevention for high-risk groups in India, in order to assist the design of future HIV prevention programmes in South Asia and beyond. Prospective costing study. This study is one of the most comprehensive studies of the costs of HIV prevention for high-risk groups to date in both its scope and size. HIV prevention included outreach, sexually transmitted infections (STI) services, condom provision, expertise enhancement, community mobilisation and enabling environment activities. Economic costs were collected from 138 non-government organisations (NGOs) in 64 districts, four state level lead implementing partners (SLPs), and the national programme level (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)) office over four years using a top down costing approach, presented in US$ 2011. Mean total unit costs (2004-08) per person reached at least once a year and per monthly contact were US$ 235(56-1864) and US$ 82(12-969) respectively. 35% of the cost was incurred by NGOs, 30% at the state level SLP and 35% at the national programme level. The proportion of total costs by activity were 34% for expertise enhancement, 37% for programme management (including support and supervision), 22% for core HIV prevention activities (outreach and STI services) and 7% for community mobilisation and enabling environment activities. Total unit cost per person reached fell sharply as the programme expanded due to declining unit costs above the service level (from US$ 477 per person reached in 2004 to US$ 145 per person reached in 2008). At the service level also unit costs decreased slightly over time from US$ 68 to US$ 64 per person reached. Scaling up HIV prevention for high risk groups requires significant investment in expertise enhancement and programme administration. However, unit costs decreased with programme expansion in spite of an increase in the scope of activities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Membership of the CHARME–1 Evaluation Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: SC AV. Performed the experiments: SC AV GS. Analyzed the data: SC AV GS LG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SC AV GS LG PV. Wrote the paper: SC AV LG PV MP MA. Contributed to the design of the study: Charme Group authors.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0106582