Selective use of sequential digital dermoscopy imaging allows a cost reduction in the melanoma detection process: a belgian study of patients with a single or a small number of atypical nevi

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 9; no. 10; p. e109339
• Main Authors: Tromme, Isabelle, Devleesschauwer, Brecht, Beutels, Philippe, Richez, Pauline, Praet, Nicolas, Sacré, Laurine, Marot, Liliane, Van Eeckhout, Pascal, Theate, Ivan, Baurain, Jean-François, Lambert, Julien, Legrand, Catherine, Thomas, Luc, Speybroeck, Niko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 14.10.2014; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Belgium; Cancer; Child; Child, Preschool; Cost analysis; Cost reduction; Costs; Costs and Cost Analysis; Dermatology; Dermoscopy - instrumentation; Digital imaging; European Continental Ancestry Group; Female; Humans; Lesions; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Melanoma; Melanoma - diagnosis; Melanoma - economics; Melanoma - pathology; Microscopy; Middle Aged; Observational studies; Pathology; Patients; Pictures; Public health; Skin diseases; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis; Skin Neoplasms - economics; Skin Neoplasms - pathology; Social Sciences; Statistical analysis; Tariffs; Young Adult; Belgium
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109339

Dermoscopy is a technique which improves melanoma detection. Optical dermoscopy uses a handheld optical device to observe the skin lesions without recording the images. Sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) allows storage of the pictures and their comparison over time. Few studies have compared optical dermoscopy and SDDI from an economic perspective. The present observational study focused on patients with one-to-three atypical melanocytic lesions, i.e. lesions considered as suspicious by optical dermoscopy. It aimed to calculate the "extra-costs" related to the process of melanoma detection. These extra-costs were defined as the costs of excision and pathology of benign lesions and/or the costs of follow-up by SDDI. The objective was to compare these extra-costs when using optical dermoscopy exclusively versus optical dermoscopy with selective use of SDDI. In a first group of patients, dermatologists were adequately trained in optical dermoscopy but worked without access to SDDI. They excised all suspicious lesions to rule out melanoma. In a second group, the dermatologists were trained in optical and digital dermoscopy. They had the opportunity of choosing between immediate excision or follow-up by SDDI (with delayed excision if significant change was observed). The comparison of extra-costs in both groups was made possible by a decision tree model and by the division of the extra-costs by the number of melanomas diagnosed in each group. Belgian official tariffs and charges were used. The extra-costs in the first and in the second group were respectively €1,613 and €1,052 per melanoma excised. The difference was statistically significant. Using the Belgian official tariffs and charges, we demonstrated that the selective use of SDDI for patients with one-to-three atypical melanocytic lesions resulted in a significant cost reduction.