Magnetic resonance imaging of SILCS diaphragm: anatomical considerations and corroboration with clinical fit

We performed a pilot study to evaluate in vivo the fit of the new SILCS diaphragm, a single-size cervical barrier, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a group of women varying in body mass and parity. Two healthy premenopausal women were recruited for each of the following groups: body mass in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContraception (Stoneham) Vol. 76; no. 3; pp. 238 - 244
Main Authors Yang, Claire C., Maravilla, Kenneth R., Kilbourne-Brook, Maggie, Austin, Glenn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.09.2007
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.090

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We performed a pilot study to evaluate in vivo the fit of the new SILCS diaphragm, a single-size cervical barrier, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a group of women varying in body mass and parity. Two healthy premenopausal women were recruited for each of the following groups: body mass index (BMI)<25, BMI=25–30 and BMI>30. One woman in each group was nulliparous and one was multiparous. Subjects were instructed on the placement of the SILCS diaphragm. Each subject underwent three MRI scans: baseline, with the SILCS diaphragm in place and after placement of intravaginal contrast and simulated intercourse. The SILCS diaphragm was easily identified on MRI. In all subjects, the diaphragm covered the cervix. The position of the diaphragm did not change after simulated intercourse. The appropriate position of the diaphragm, as assessed by the subjects and the practitioner, was corroborated by the MR images. The intravaginal contrast was not readily visible on the images, precluding assessment of the diaphragm's barrier properties. MRI confirms the anatomic position of the SILCS diaphragm in vivo, among a sample of women varying in body mass and parity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.090