Heterogeneous EGFR gene copy number increase is common in colorectal cancer and defines response to anti-EGFR therapy

Anti-EGFR therapy is commonly used to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), although only a subset of patients benefit from the treatment. While KRAS mutation predicts non-responsiveness, positive predictive markers are not in clinical practice. We previously showed that immunohistochemistry (IHC)-guided E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 6; p. e99590
Main Authors Ålgars, Annika, Avoranta, Tuulia, Österlund, Pia, Lintunen, Minnamaija, Sundström, Jari, Jokilehto, Terhi, Ristimäki, Ari, Ristamäki, Raija, Carpén, Olli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 18.06.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Anti-EGFR therapy is commonly used to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), although only a subset of patients benefit from the treatment. While KRAS mutation predicts non-responsiveness, positive predictive markers are not in clinical practice. We previously showed that immunohistochemistry (IHC)-guided EGFR gene copy number (GCN) analysis may identify CRC patients benefiting from anti-EGFR treatment. Here we tested the predictive value of such analysis in chemorefractory metastatic CRC, elucidated EGFR GCN heterogeneity within the tumors, and evaluated the association between EGFR GCN, KRAS status, and anti-EGFR antibody response in CRC cell lines. The chemorefractory patient cohort consisted of 54 KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic CRC patients. EGFR GCN status was analyzed by silver in situ hybridization using a cut-off value of 4.0 EGFR gene copies/cell. KRAS-WT and KRAS mutant CRC cell lines with different EGFR GCN were used in in vitro studies. The chemorefractory CRC tumors with EGFR GCN increase (≥4.0) responded better to anti-EGFR therapy than EGFR GCN (<4.0) tumors (clinical benefit, P = 0.0004; PFS, HR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.46). EGFR GCN counted using EGFR IHC guidance was significantly higher than the value from randomly selected areas verifying intratumoral EGFR GCN heterogeneity. In CRC cell lines, EGFR GCN correlated with EGFR expression. Best anti-EGFR response was seen with KRAS-WT, EGFR GCN = 4 cells and poorest response with KRAS-WT, EGFR GCN = 2 cells. Anti-EGFR response was associated with AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which was effectively inhibited only in cells with KRAS-WT and increased EGFR GCN. In conclusion, IHC-guided EGFR GCN is a promising predictor of anti-EGFR treatment efficacy in chemorefractory CRC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: AÅ TA PÖ ML JS TJ AR RR OC. Performed the experiments: ML JS TJ. Analyzed the data: AÅ TA PÖ ML JS TJ AR RR OC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AÅ TA PÖ ML JS TJ AR RR OC. Wrote the paper: AÅ TA PÖ ML JS TJ AR RR OC.
Competing Interests: AÅ, ML, JS, RR and OC are inventors in a patent related to this work: US 20110217296 A1 Method for selecting patients for treatment with an EGFR inhibitor. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0099590