Application of an echocardiographic scoring system of left ventricular filling pressure to diagnose acute heart failure in patients complaining dyspnea

• Published in: Journal of Cardiology Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 62 - 68
• Main Authors: Tamaki, Yoji, Iwano, Hiroyuki, Murayama, Michito, Ishizaka, Suguru, Motoi, Ko, Aoyagi, Hiroyuki, Nakamura, Kosuke, Goto, Mana, Suzuki, Yukino, Yokoyama, Shinobu, Nishino, Hisao, Nakabachi, Masahiro, Kaga, Sanae, Kamiya, Kiwamu, Nagai, Toshiyuki, Anzai, Toshihisa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2023; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Acute heart failure; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dyspnea; Dyspnea - diagnosis; Dyspnea - etiology; Echocardiography; Echocardiography - methods; Heart Failure; Heart Failure - complications; Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography - methods; VMT score; Echocardiography; Dyspnea; VMT score; Acute heart failure
• ISSN: 0914-5087; 1876-4738; 1876-4738
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.04.016

Dyspnea is a common symptom in acute heart failure (AHF) patients. Although an accurate and rapid diagnosis of AHF is essential to improve prognosis, estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (FP) remains challenging, especially for noncardiologists. We evaluated the usefulness of a recently-proposed parameter of LV FP, visually assessed time difference between the mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening (VMT) score, to detect AHF in patients complaining of dyspnea. Echocardiography and lung ultrasonography (LUS) were performed in 121 consecutive patients (68 ± 14 years old, 75 males) presenting with dyspnea. The VMT score was determined from the atrioventricular valve opening phase (tricuspid valve first: 0, simultaneous: 1, mitral valve first: 2) and inferior vena cava dilatation (absent: 0, present: 1), and VMT ≥2 was judged as positive. LUS was performed with the 8 zones method and judged as positive if 3 or more B-lines were observed in bilateral regions. The AHF diagnosis was performed by certified cardiologists according to recent guidelines. Of the 121 patients, 33 were diagnosed with AHF. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing AHF were 64 % and 84 % for LUS and 94 % and 88 % for VMT score. In logistic regression analysis, VMT score showed a significantly higher c-index than LUS (0.91 vs 0.74, p = 0.002). In multivariable analyses, VMT score was associated with AHF independently of clinically relevant covariates and LUS. In addition, serial assessment of VMT score followed by LUS provided a diagnostic flow chart to diagnose AHF (VMT 3: AHF definitive, VMT 2 and LUS positive: AHF highly suspicious; VMT 2 and LUS negative: further investigation is needed; VMT ≤ 1: AHF rejected). VMT score showed high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing AHF. Combined assessment of the VMT score and LUS could become a reliable strategy for diagnosis of AHF by non-cardiologists. [Display omitted] •Accurate diagnosis of AHF due to elevated LVFP is often challenging.•An echocardiographic scoring system to detect elevated LVFP was tested in ER.•The VMT score showed an acceptable predictive value to diagnose AHF.•Diagnostic flow by using VMT score and lung ultrasonography was proposed.