A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Use of Oral Glucose with or without Gentle Facilitated Tucking of Infants during Neonatal Echocardiography
To compare the effect of oral glucose given with or without facilitated tucking (FT), versus placebo (water) to facilitate image acquisition during a targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE). Factorial, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Infants...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 10; no. 10; p. e0141015 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare the effect of oral glucose given with or without facilitated tucking (FT), versus placebo (water) to facilitate image acquisition during a targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE).
Factorial, double blind, randomized controlled trial.
Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Infants born between 26 and 42 weeks of gestation (GA).
One of four treatment groups: oral water (placebo), oral glucose (25%), facilitated tucking with oral water or facilitated tucking with oral glucose, during a single, structured TNE. All infants received a soother.
Change in Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP) scores.
104 preterm infants were randomized (mean ± SD GA: 33.4 ± 3.5 weeks). BIIP scores remained low during the echocardiography scan (median, [IQ range]: 0, [0 to 1]). There were no differences in the level of agitation of infants amongst the treatment groups, with estimated reductions in mean BIIP relative to control of 0.27 (95%CI -0.40 to 0.94) with use of oral glucose and .04 (-0.63 to 0.70) with facilitated tucking. There were also no differences between treatment groups in the quality and duration of the echocardiography scans.
In stable infants in the NICU, a TNE can be performed with minimal disruption in a majority of cases, simply by providing a soother. The use of 25% glucose water in this context did not provide further benefit in reducing agitation and improving image acquisition.
Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01253889. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Conceived and designed the experiments: PML AS RB LH. Performed the experiments: PML AS JT AJ MJ EC PB PJM EK. Analyzed the data: PML RB PJM LH. Wrote the paper: PML RB PJM LH. Current address: Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Current address: King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Current address: University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0141015 |