Doing harm reduction better: syringe exchange in the United States

• Published in: Addiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 104; no. 9; pp. 1441 - 1446
• Main Authors: Des Jarlais, Don C., McKnight, Courtney, Goldblatt, Cullen, Purchase, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2009
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Disease prevention; Drug addiction; Drug addicts; Drug use; Harm Reduction; Health policy; Hepatitis; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C virus; HIV; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Hypodermic needles; injecting drug use; Needle-Exchange Programs - economics; Needle-Exchange Programs - supply & distribution; Prevention programs; Public health; Social problems; State Government; Substance abuse; Substance Abuse, Intravenous - economics; substance use; syringe exchange; U.S.A; United States; United States
• ISSN: 0965-2140; 1360-0443
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02465.x

ABSTRACT Objective  To trace the growth of syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in the United States since 1994–95 and assess the current state of SEPs. Methods  Annual surveys of US SEPs known to North American Syringe Exchange Network (NASEN). Surveys mailed to executive directors with follow‐up interviews by telephone and/or e‐mail. Response rates have varied between 70% and 88% since surveys were initiated in 1996. Results  The numbers of programs known to NASEN have increased from 68 in 1994–95 to 186 in 2007. Among programs participating in the survey, numbers of syringes exchanged have increased from 8.0 million per year to 29.5 million per year, total annual budgets have increased from $6.3 to $19.6 million and public funding (from state and local governments) has increased from $3.9 to $14.4 million. In 2007, 89% of programs permitted secondary exchange and 76% encouraged it. Condoms, referrals to substance abuse treatment, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) counseling and testing and naloxone for overdose were among the most commonly provided services in addition to basic syringe exchange. Each of these services was provided by 40% or more of SEPs in 2007. Conclusions  While syringe exchange has remained controversial in the United States, there has been very substantial growth in numbers of programs, syringes exchange and program budgets. Utilizing secondary exchange to reach large numbers of injecting drug users and utilizing SEPs as a new platform for providing health and social services beyond basic syringe exchange have been the two major organizational strategies in the growth of SEPs in the United States.