Performance of Pain Interventionalists From Different Specialties in Treating Degenerative Disk Disease-Related Low Back Pain

• Published in: Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation Vol. 2; no. 3; p. 100060
• Main Authors: Shi, Weibin, Agbese, Edeanya, Solaiman, Adnan Z., Leslie, Douglas L., Gater, David R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2020; Elsevier
• Subjects: Cost-benefit analysis; Injections, epidural; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Low back pain; Original Research; Physical therapy modalities; Radiculopathy; Rehabilitation; Cost-benefit analysis; DDD; Low back pain; Injections, epidural; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Radiculopathy; Rehabilitation; LBP; Physical therapy modalities; LBP, low back pain; DDD, disk degenerative disease
• ISSN: 2590-1095; 2590-1095
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100060

To examine the utilization of current common treatments by providers from different specialties and the effect on delaying spinal surgery in patients with disk degenerative disease (DDD) related low back pain. Retrospective observational study using data from the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (2005-2013). Not applicable. Patients (N=6229) newly diagnosed with DDD-related low back pain who received interventional treatments from only 1 provider specialty and continuously enrolled in the database for 3 years after diagnosis. Measures of treatment utilization and cost were constructed for patients who received spinal surgery within 3 years after diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine time to surgery among provider specialties and generalized linear models were used to examine cost differences among provider specialties. Of the 6229 patients, 427 (6.86%) underwent spinal surgery with unadjusted mean interventional treatment costs ranging from $555 to $851. Although the differences in mean costs across provider specialties were large, they were not statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards models showed that there was no significant difference between provider specialties in the time from DDD diagnosis to spinal surgery. However, patients diagnosed with DDD at a younger age and receiving physical therapy had significantly delayed time to surgery (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.81 and hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96, respectively). Although there were no statistically significant differences among provider specialties for time to surgery and cost, patients receiving physical therapy had significantly delayed time to surgery.