Topical Antihistamines Display Potent Anti-Inflammatory Activity Linked in Part to Enhanced Permeability Barrier Function

Systemic antagonists of the histamine type 1 and 2 receptors (H1/2r) are widely used as anti-pruritics and central sedatives, but demonstrate only modest anti-inflammatory activity. Because many inflammatory dermatoses result from defects in cutaneous barrier function, and because keratinocytes expr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of investigative dermatology Vol. 133; no. 2; pp. 469 - 478
Main Authors Lin, Tzu-Kai, Man, Mao-Qiang, Santiago, Juan-Luis, Park, Kyungho, Roelandt, Truus, Oda, Yuko, Hupe, Melanie, Crumrine, Debra, Lee, Hae-Jin, Gschwandtner, Maria, Thyssen, Jacob P., Trullas, Carles, Tschachler, Erwin, Feingold, Kenneth R., Elias, Peter M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2013
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Systemic antagonists of the histamine type 1 and 2 receptors (H1/2r) are widely used as anti-pruritics and central sedatives, but demonstrate only modest anti-inflammatory activity. Because many inflammatory dermatoses result from defects in cutaneous barrier function, and because keratinocytes express both Hr1 and Hr2, we hypothesized that H1/2r antagonists might be more effective if they were used topically to treat inflammatory dermatoses. Topical H1/2r antagonists additively enhanced permeability barrier homeostasis in normal mouse skin by the following mechanisms: (i) stimulation of epidermal differentiation, leading to thickened cornified envelopes; and (ii) enhanced epidermal lipid synthesis and secretion. As barrier homeostasis was enhanced to a comparable extent in mast cell–deficient mice, with no further improvement following application of topical H1/2r antagonists, H1/2r antagonists likely oppose mast cell–derived histamines. In four immunologically diverse, murine disease models, characterized by either inflammation alone (acute irritant contact dermatitis, acute allergic contact dermatitis) or by prominent barrier abnormalities (subacute allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis), topical H1/2r agonists aggravated, whereas H1/2r antagonists improved, inflammation and/or barrier function. The apparent ability of topical H1r/2r antagonists to target epidermal H1/2r could translate into increased efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses, likely due to decreased inflammation and enhanced barrier function. These results could shift current paradigms of antihistamine utilization from a predominantly systemic to a topical approach.
Bibliography:Each of these three authors contributed equally, and should be considered co-first authors.
ISSN:0022-202X
1523-1747
DOI:10.1038/jid.2012.335