Primary Somatosensory Cortex Function in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: The journal of pain Vol. 14; no. 10; pp. 1001 - 1018
• Main Authors: Di Pietro, Flavia, McAuley, James H, Parkitny, Luke, Lotze, Martin, Wand, Benedict M, Moseley, G. Lorimer, Stanton, Tasha R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2013
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care; Complex regional pain syndrome; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes - physiopathology; cortical reorganization; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Female; Glucose - metabolism; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; neuroimaging; Pain Measurement; Pain Medicine; primary somatosensory cortex; Publication Bias; Somatosensory Cortex - physiopathology; Young Adult; primary somatosensory cortex; cortical reorganization; Complex regional pain syndrome; S1; neuroimaging
• ISSN: 1526-5900; 1528-8447
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.04.001

Abstract That complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is associated with functional reorganization in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is widely accepted and seldom questioned. Despite more than a decade of research, there has been no systematic review of the CRPS literature concerning the changes in S1 function, and therefore the extent of these changes is unclear. Here we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the spatial and temporal aspects of S1 function in CRPS. A comprehensive search strategy identified functional neuroimaging studies of S1 in CRPS. We adhered to a rigorous systematic review protocol when extracting data and appraising risk of bias. Outcomes were grouped into spatial representation; activation levels, including disinhibition; peak latency of activation; and glucose metabolism. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible. Fifteen studies were included, all investigating upper-extremity CRPS. In patients with CRPS, the S1 spatial representation of the affected hand is smaller than that of the unaffected hand and that of non-CRPS controls; however, this evidence comes from only a few studies. There is no difference in activation, disinhibition, or latency of peripherally evoked S1 responses in CRPS. The risk of bias was high across studies, mainly from unclear sampling methods and unblinded analysis of outcomes. Perspective The evidence for a difference in function of the primary somatosensory cortex in CRPS compared with controls is clouded by high risk of bias and conflicting results, but reduced representation size seems consistent.