Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve

Abstract Objective To evaluate the midterm hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. Methods In a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, follow-up study, 710 patients underwent surgical implantation of a pericardial stented aortic prosthesis (Trifecta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 153; no. 3; pp. 561 - 569.e2
Main Authors Goldman, Scott, MD, Cheung, Anson, MD, Bavaria, Joseph E., MD, Petracek, Michael R., MD, Groh, Mark A., MD, Schaff, Hartzell V., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To evaluate the midterm hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. Methods In a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, follow-up study, 710 patients underwent surgical implantation of a pericardial stented aortic prosthesis (Trifecta valve; St Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minn). The valve is constructed from bovine pericardium mounted externally onto a titanium stent. Subjects were followed on an annual basis over 6 years. Results Operations were performed from 2007 to 2009, and mean age was 72.4 ± 9.3 years; 471 of 710 (66.3%) were men. Preoperatively, 361 of 710 (50.8%) of patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and at 6 years postoperatively, 92 of 96 (95.8%) were New York Heart Association class I or II. Six years postoperatively, average mean gradient across all valve sizes was 11.0 mm Hg, and the average effective orifice area index was 0.80 cm2 /m2 . The proportion of patients without moderate-to-severe valvular regurgitation at 6 years was 95.2% (80/84). Six years postoperatively, freedom from valve-related mortality, nonstructural dysfunction, and paravalvular leak were 98.3%, 98.6%, and 98.9%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration was 97.3% (95% confidence limits, 98.6-94.7). Conclusion These midterm results demonstrate that the Trifecta valve is a safe and effective valve substitute with excellent hemodynamic performance and durability that is maintained through the 6-year follow-up period.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-2
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089