Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve
Abstract Objective To evaluate the midterm hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. Methods In a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, follow-up study, 710 patients underwent surgical implantation of a pericardial stented aortic prosthesis (Trifecta...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 153; no. 3; pp. 561 - 569.e2 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective To evaluate the midterm hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. Methods In a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, follow-up study, 710 patients underwent surgical implantation of a pericardial stented aortic prosthesis (Trifecta valve; St Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minn). The valve is constructed from bovine pericardium mounted externally onto a titanium stent. Subjects were followed on an annual basis over 6 years. Results Operations were performed from 2007 to 2009, and mean age was 72.4 ± 9.3 years; 471 of 710 (66.3%) were men. Preoperatively, 361 of 710 (50.8%) of patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and at 6 years postoperatively, 92 of 96 (95.8%) were New York Heart Association class I or II. Six years postoperatively, average mean gradient across all valve sizes was 11.0 mm Hg, and the average effective orifice area index was 0.80 cm2 /m2 . The proportion of patients without moderate-to-severe valvular regurgitation at 6 years was 95.2% (80/84). Six years postoperatively, freedom from valve-related mortality, nonstructural dysfunction, and paravalvular leak were 98.3%, 98.6%, and 98.9%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration was 97.3% (95% confidence limits, 98.6-94.7). Conclusion These midterm results demonstrate that the Trifecta valve is a safe and effective valve substitute with excellent hemodynamic performance and durability that is maintained through the 6-year follow-up period. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-2 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0022-5223 1097-685X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089 |