Digital PCR can provide improved BCR-ABL1 detection in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in deep molecular response and sensitivity of standard quantitative methods using EAC assays

BCR-ABL1 molecular detection using quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods is the golden standard of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) monitoring. However, due to variable sensitivity of qPCR assays across laboratories, alternative methods are tested. Digital PCR (dPCR) has been suggested as a robust and repro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPractical laboratory medicine Vol. 25; p. e00210
Main Authors Smitalova, Dagmar, Dvorakova, Dana, Racil, Zdenek, Romzova, Marianna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.05.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BCR-ABL1 molecular detection using quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods is the golden standard of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) monitoring. However, due to variable sensitivity of qPCR assays across laboratories, alternative methods are tested. Digital PCR (dPCR) has been suggested as a robust and reproducible option. Here we present a comparison of droplet dPCR with routinely used reverse-transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) and automated GeneXpert systems. Detection limit of dPCR was above 3 BCR-ABL1 copies, although due to background amplification the resulting sensitivity was 0.01% BCR-ABL1 (MR4.0). Nevertheless, in comparison with GeneXpert, dPCR categorized more than 50% of the patients into different MR groups, showing a potential for improved BCR-ABL1 detection. •dPCR assays attain MR4.0 sensitivity due to a blank amplification 3 BCR-ABL1 copies.•Quantification principle of RT-qPCR and dPCR introduces bias in copy numbers.•dPCR provides more sensitive BCR-ABL1 measurement in >50% MR3.0-MR4.5 CML patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Permanent address: Ml.Stavbaru 1884, Otrokovice, 76502, Czech Republic.
ISSN:2352-5517
2352-5517
DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00210