Pronator quadratus repair after volar plating of distal radius fractures or not? Results of a prospective randomized trial

• Published in: European journal of medical research Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 93
• Main Authors: Häberle, Sandra, Sandmann, Gunther Hubertus, Deiler, Stephan, Kraus, Tobias Maximilian, Fensky, Florian, Torsiglieri, Tobias, Rondak, Ina-Christine, Biberthaler, Peter, Stöckle, Ulrich, Siebenlist, Sebastian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 25.11.2015; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Bone Plates; Comparative analysis; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Humans; Internal fixation in fractures; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal - injuries; Orthopedic Procedures - methods; Radius Fractures - surgery; Radius Fractures - therapy; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
• ISSN: 2047-783X; 0949-2321; 2047-783X
• DOI: 10.1186/s40001-015-0187-4

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with special regards to the forearm pronation strength. During the early recovery period of 3 months, an improvement of pronation strength and functional scorings was hypothesized for the PQ repair when compared to no repair. The inclusion criteria were (1) men or women between 18 and 80 years, (2) isolated, closed fractures of the distal radius, (3) A2 to B2 types of fracture according to the AO fracture classification system, (4) primary volar locking plate osteosynthesis. Patients were randomized to group A = PQ repair and group B = no repair. Follow-up examinations after 6 and 12 weeks included bilateral isometric pronation strength measurement, range of motion, the QuickDASH and the Mayo-Wrist-Score, and a visual analog scale (VAS). 60 patients (n = 31 in group A and n = 29 in group B) with an average age of 54 years (range 22-77 years) returned for both follow-up visits. The pronation strength measurements showed no significant differences between groups (PQ repair vs. no repair) neither at 6 weeks nor at 12 weeks. Additionally, no statistical significant differences were noted for ROM, QuickDASH-Score or Mayo-Wrist-Score. The VAS scoring revealed a significant decreased pain level after PQ repair at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.017). An improved pronation strength after PQ repair in the early rehabilitation period could not be confirmed. However, the PQ repair might reduce pain in the early postoperative period. NCT02595229 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 02 November 2015).