Selection of Carotid Artery Stenting or Endarterectomy Based on Magnetic Resonance Plaque Imaging Reduced Periprocedural Adverse Events

Background The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of treatment selection, either carotid stenting or endarterectomy, based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) plaque imaging on periprocedural events. Methods A total of 205 consecutive patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases Vol. 22; no. 7; pp. 1082 - 1087
Main Authors Yoshimura, Shinichi, MD, PhD, Yamada, Kiyofumi, MD, PhD, Kawasaki, Masanori, MD, PhD, Asano, Takahiko, MD, Kanematsu, Masayuki, MD, Miyai, Masafumi, MD, Enomoto, Yukiko, MD, PhD, Egashira, Yusuke, MD, Iwama, Toru, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of treatment selection, either carotid stenting or endarterectomy, based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) plaque imaging on periprocedural events. Methods A total of 205 consecutive patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis scheduled for elective revascularization with stenting or endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. In period 1, 95 patients were treated regardless of preoperative plaque imaging. In period 2, 110 patients received time of flight MR angiography, and endarterectomy was selected when a high-intensity signal in the plaque was observed on MR angiography because it indicated an unstable plaque. Periprocedural clinical results and outcome at 30 days were analyzed. Results In period 1, 5 patients (5.3%) were treated with endarterectomy and the other 90 patients (94.7%) were treated with stenting. In period 2, 35 patients (31.8%) were treated with endarterectomy and the other 75 patients (68.2%) were treated with stenting. Periprocedural adverse events, including any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, were significantly more frequent in period 1 than in period 2 (9.5% v 1.8%; P = .034). Ischemic stroke was significantly reduced from period 1 to period 2 (7.4% v 0.9%; P = .043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed “treatment selection by plaque imaging” was the only factor identified as an independent predictor of periprocedural events ( P  = .043). Conclusions Treatment selection based on preoperative plaque imaging appears useful for reducing periprocedural events of carotid artery revascularizations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1052-3057
1532-8511
DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.018