Behavioral response to fluoxetine in both female and male mice is modulated by dentate gyrus granule cell activity

• Published in: Neurobiology of stress Vol. 13; p. 100257
• Main Authors: Yohn, Christine N., Dieterich, Andrew, Maita, Isabella, Bazer, Allyson S., Diethorn, Emma, Ma, Debbie, Gergues, Mark M., Hu, Pu, Samuels, Benjamin A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2020; Elsevier
• Subjects: Antidepressant; Anxiety; Chronic stress; Dentate gyrus; Depression; Original; Sex differences; Antidepressant; Sex differences; Depression; Dentate gyrus; Chronic stress; Anxiety
• ISSN: 2352-2895; 2352-2895
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100257

Depression is a complex psychiatric disorder that is a major burden on society, with only ~33% of depressed patients attaining remission upon initial monotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). In preclinical studies using rodents, chronic stress paradigms, such as chronic corticosterone and social instability stress, are used to induce avoidance behaviors associated with negative affective states. Chronic fluoxetine (FLX; an SSRI) treatment reverses these chronic stress-induced behavioral changes in some, but not all mice, permitting stratification of mice into behavioral responders and non-responders to FLX. We previously reported that 5-HT1A receptors, which are Gi-coupled inhibitory receptors, on mature granule cells (GCs) in the dentate gyrus (DG) are necessary and sufficient for the behavioral, neurogenic, and neuroendocrine response to chronic SSRI treatment. Since inhibition of mature DG GCs through cell autonomous Gi-coupled receptors is critical for mounting an antidepressant response, we assessed the relationship between behavioral response to FLX and DG GC activation in FLX responders, non-responders, and stress controls in both male and female mice. Intriguingly, using disparate stress paradigms, we found that male and female behavioral FLX responders show decreased DG GC activation (as measured by cFos immunostaining) relative to non-responders and stress controls. We then show in both sexes that chronic inhibition of ventral DG GCs (through usage of Gi-DREADDs) results in a decrease in maladaptive avoidance behaviors, while ventral DG GCs stimulation with Gq-DREADDs increases maladaptive behaviors. Finally, we were able to bidirectionally control the behavioral response to FLX through modulation of DG GCs. Chronic inhibition of ventral DG GCs with Gi-DREADDs converted FLX non-responders into responders, while activation of ventral DG GCs with Gq-DREADDs converted FLX responders into non-responders. This study illustrates ventral DG GC activity is a major modulator of the behavioral response to FLX in both male and female mice.