Background nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural and natural lands: a meta-analysis

AIM: This study aimed at better characterising background nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions (BNE) in agricultural and natural lands. METHODS: We compiled and analysed field-measured data for annual background N₂O emission in agricultural (BNEA) and natural (BNEN) lands from 600 and 307 independent exper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant and soil Vol. 373; no. 1-2; pp. 17 - 30
Main Authors Kim, Dong-Gill, Giltrap, Donna, Hernandez-Ramirez, Guillermo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer-Verlag 01.12.2013
Springer
Springer Netherlands
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: This study aimed at better characterising background nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions (BNE) in agricultural and natural lands. METHODS: We compiled and analysed field-measured data for annual background N₂O emission in agricultural (BNEA) and natural (BNEN) lands from 600 and 307 independent experimental studies, respectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between BNEA (median: 0.70 & mean: 1.52 kg N₂O − N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) and BNEN (median:0.31 & mean:1.75 kg N₂O − N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) (P > 0.05). A simultaneous comparison across all BNEA and BNEN indicated that BNEs from riparian, vegetable crop fields and intentional fallow areas were significantly higher than from boreal forests (P < 0.05). Correlation and regression analyses supported the underlying associations of soil organic carbon (C), nitrogen (N), pH, bulk density (BD),and/or air temperature (AT) with BNEs to a varying degree as a function of land-use or ecosystem type (Ps < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although overall BNEN tended to be lower than BNEA on median basis, results in general suggest that land-use shifts between natural and managed production systems would not result in consistent changes in BNE.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1762-5
ISSN:0032-079X
1573-5036
DOI:10.1007/s11104-013-1762-5