The Two Faces of Analyst Coverage

We find that positive excess (strong) analyst coverage is associated with overvaluation and low future returns. This finding is consistent with the view that excessive analyst coverage, driven by investment banking incentives and analyst self-interests, raises investor optimism causing share prices...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFinancial management Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 99 - 125
Main Authors Doukas, John A., Kim, Chansog (Francis), Pantzalis, Christos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2005
Financial Management Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We find that positive excess (strong) analyst coverage is associated with overvaluation and low future returns. This finding is consistent with the view that excessive analyst coverage, driven by investment banking incentives and analyst self-interests, raises investor optimism causing share prices to trade above fundamental value. However, weak analyst coverage causes stocks to trade below fundamental values. This finding indicates that investors tend to believe that these firms are more likely to be plagued by information asymmetries and agency problems. The results remain robust after controlling for the possible endogenous nature of analyst coverage and analysts' self-selection bias.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-0VBCCGKN-Q
ArticleID:FIMA99
istex:19F34CED9005D11431BE0D5A1F663CF241C9930D
The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of an anonymous referee and I/B/E/S International Inc. for providing earnings per share forecast data, available through the Institutional Brokers Estimate Systems.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0046-3892
1755-053X
DOI:10.1111/j.1755-053X.2005.tb00101.x