The Two Faces of Analyst Coverage
We find that positive excess (strong) analyst coverage is associated with overvaluation and low future returns. This finding is consistent with the view that excessive analyst coverage, driven by investment banking incentives and analyst self-interests, raises investor optimism causing share prices...
Saved in:
Published in | Financial management Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 99 - 125 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2005
Financial Management Association |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We find that positive excess (strong) analyst coverage is associated with overvaluation and low future returns. This finding is consistent with the view that excessive analyst coverage, driven by investment banking incentives and analyst self-interests, raises investor optimism causing share prices to trade above fundamental value. However, weak analyst coverage causes stocks to trade below fundamental values. This finding indicates that investors tend to believe that these firms are more likely to be plagued by information asymmetries and agency problems. The results remain robust after controlling for the possible endogenous nature of analyst coverage and analysts' self-selection bias. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-0VBCCGKN-Q ArticleID:FIMA99 istex:19F34CED9005D11431BE0D5A1F663CF241C9930D The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of an anonymous referee and I/B/E/S International Inc. for providing earnings per share forecast data, available through the Institutional Brokers Estimate Systems. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0046-3892 1755-053X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2005.tb00101.x |