Phantoms and Fabrications: Young Children's Detection of Implausible Lies

• Published in: Child development Vol. 73; no. 6; pp. 1688 - 1702
• Main Authors: Lee, Kang, Cameron, Catherine Ann, Doucette, Joanne, Talwar, Victoria
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston, USA and Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishers Inc 01.11.2002; Blackwell Publishers; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Adults; Age Differences; Age groups; Case studies; Child; Child development; Child psychology; Child, Preschool; Children; Cognition and Language; Cognitive Development; Comparative Analysis; Deceit; Deception; Development; Developmental psychology; Family studies; Fantasy; Fantasy fiction; Fantasy Reality Dichotomy; Female; Honesty; Humans; Inferences; Knowledge; Lie detection; Lying; Male; Mothers; Perceptions; Performance Factors; Picture books; Protagonists; Random Allocation; Young Children
• ISSN: 0009-3920; 1467-8624
• DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00499

The present study investigated whether young children are gullible and readily deceived by another's lies. Specifically, this study examined whether young children believe a lie teller's statement when the statement violates their developing knowledge of a distinction between reality and fantasy. In the first three experiments 3- to 6-year-olds (N = 293) were presented with either a story or a live staged event in which an individual made an implausible statement about a misdeed (claiming that a ghost jumped out of a book and broke a glass). A significant age effect was obtained: 5- and 6-year-olds tended to report that the individual who made the implausible statement had actually committed the misdeed, whereas 3- and 4-year-olds tended to accept the claim of the protagonist. Experiment 4 revealed that 5- and 6-year-olds (N = 43) not only disbelieved an individual's implausible statement but also inferred that the individual was lying and had a deceptive intent. In contrast, Experiment 5 revealed that 3- and 4-year-olds (N = 41) had difficulty disbelieving an individual's implausible claim about an inanimate object (i.e., the claim that a chair came alive and broke the glass). The findings suggest that 5- and 6-year-olds are not so gullible as previously thought, and that they use their well-developed real-world knowledge to detect scapegoating lies. In contrast, many younger children tend to believe another's implausible lies, perhaps due to the fact that the knowledge needed to detect such lies has not yet been consolidated.