Acute Care Surgery Models Worldwide: A Systematic Review

• Published in: World journal of surgery Vol. 44; no. 8; pp. 2622 - 2637
• Main Authors: van der Wee, Mats J. L., van der Wilden, Gwendolyn, Hoencamp, Rigo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.08.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Critical care; Critical Care - organization & administration; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration; Emergencies; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical services; Emergency Medical Services - organization & administration; Emergency Service, Hospital; Europe; General Surgery; Heterogeneity; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Models, Organizational; Scientific Review; Surgery; Surgery Department, Hospital - organization & administration; Systematic review; Thoracic Surgery; United States; Vascular Surgery; United States; Europe
• ISSN: 0364-2313; 1432-2323
• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05536-9

Background The Acute Care Surgery (ACS) model was developed as a dedicated service for the provision of 24/7 nontrauma emergency surgical care. This systematic review investigated which components are essential in an ACS model and the state of implementation of ACS models worldwide. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases. All relevant data of ACS models were extracted from included articles. Results The search identified 62 articles describing ACS models in 13 countries. The majority consist of a dedicated nontrauma emergency surgical service, with daytime on-site attending coverage (cleared from elective duties), and 24/7 in-house resident coverage. Emergency department coverage and operating room access varied widely. Critical care is fully embedded in the original US model as part of the acute care chain (ACC), but is still a separate unit in most other countries. While in most European countries, ACS is not a recognized specialty yet, there is a tendency toward more structured acute care. Conclusions Large national and international heterogeneity exists in the structure and components of the ACS model. Critical care is still a separate component in most systems, although it is an essential part of the ACC to provide the best pre-, intra- and postoperative care of the physiologically deranged patient. Universal acceptance of one global ACS model seems challenging; however, a global consensus on essential components would benefit any healthcare system.