Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

• Published in: World journal of surgery Vol. 45; no. 11; pp. 3341 - 3349
• Main Authors: Verstegen, Moniek H. P., Slaman, Annelijn E., Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R., van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I., Gisbertz, Suzanne S., Rosman, Camiel, van Workum, Frans
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.11.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology; Anastomotic Leak - etiology; Cancer; Cardiac Surgery; Cervix; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Complications; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery; Esophagectomy - adverse effects; Esophagus; General Surgery; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Morbidity; Mortality; Original Scientific Report; Patients; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
• ISSN: 0364-2313; 1432-2323
• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06250-w

Background Anastomotic leakage has a great impact on clinical outcomes after esophagectomy. It has never been studied whether anastomotic leakage is of equal severity between different types of esophagectomy (i.e., transhiatal, McKeown and Ivor Lewis) in terms of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Methods All esophageal cancer patients with anastomotic leakage after transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between 2011 and 2019 were selected from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) registry. The primary outcome was 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, re-operation and ICU readmission rate. Results Data from 1030 patients with anastomotic leakage after transhiatal ( n =287), McKeown ( n =397) and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy ( n =346) were evaluated. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate was 4.5% in patients with leakage after transhiatal esophagectomy, 8.1% after McKeown and 8.1% after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy ( P =0.139). After correction for confounders, leakage after transhiatal resection was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.152–0.699, P =0.004), but mortality after McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was similar. Re-operation rate was 24.0% after transhiatal, 40.6% after McKeown and 41.3% after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy ( P <0.001). ICU readmission rate was 24.0% after transhiatal, 37.8% after McKeown and 43.4% after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy ( P <0.001). Conclusion This study in patients with anastomotic leakage confirms a strong association between severity of clinical consequences and different types of esophagectomy. It supports the hypothesis that cervical leakage is generally less severe than intrathoracic leakage. The clinical impact of anastomotic leakage should be taken into account, in addition to its incidence, when different types of esophagectomy are compared by clinicians or researchers.